Ryobi Riding Lawn Mower Review Second Test

Dollhouse - HENRIK IBSEN

Plot Summary .-

Nora Helmer, a housewife, which is oppressed by her husband, so that, for discrimination against women in the S. XIX in the Scandinavian countries, decisions and constructor were not even considered.

Torvald Helmer, Nora's husband and close to be the new director of a bank, which helped his family out of a recession, he was sick almost to deathdoorstep of Helmer, giving Nora found out he was going to be dismissed in exchange for Mrs. Linde, Nora threatening to tell Torvald about the loan unless she convinced him not to dismiss Krogstad.

Nora Krogstad tried to advocate, but her husband was angry with her for trying to influence their decision, and secured to Nora that Krogstad be fired.

Krogstad handed a letter to Torvald, communicating what has been done by Nora. Torvald, as expected was angry with Nora, which realized that both his father's house as that of Torvald had always been treated like a doll, being used to "play" without theJarle use its free, why Torvald abandoned.

Analysis .- actions

Borrowing to save her husband, but was forbidden.

l

Agent: Nora Helmer. & l

XC Media: borrow from behind the legal.

l

Results: You can pay for holidays and Torvald is saved.

l

Consequences: is indebted to Krogstad, causing the problems and it could blackmail and also have realized that was no longer an object for Torvald, which though it saved his life angry because he asked the loan.

Hide

loan information

Krogstad l

Agent: Nora Helmer.

l

Intent: to prevent Torvald be angry with her.

l

Belief: by hiding the truth and tell Torvaldit was a loan from his father, even though he died three days before that in which the note was signed, that Torvald would not get angry.

l

Details: Torvald was too proud to ask for a loan, even though he was about to die, and it was illegal Nora asked for a loan.

l

Media:

deception. l

Results: is extorted by Krogstad. l

Consequences: Torvald is angry with her and she flees.

blackmail Nora l

Agent: Krogstad.

l & amp; nbsp;

Intent: to avoid being fired.

l

Belief: by manipulating Nora, that Torvald would rather die than find out, I will be able to even get a job higher.

l

Details: Krogstad had children to support.

& ls in mind that what saves lives is good, his action is totally good. Even if we believe the media, perhaps could not be called a good action in terms of St. Thomas, since for him that an action is good means that all components are.

l Freedom of Nora was invalid, had never made a decision for itself, except to ask for the loan and to abandon their home. Fearing that Torvald learns of the first, although it is a good deed, it also saved his life, he blames generated (the penalty for failure to comply is a moral law). This is becauserealize their options were slim to make the decision, in addition know that Torvald never forgive.

l The influence of social laws is present throughout the work, and that is what the author wants to emphasize, as the uselessness of these cases is put forward.

Conclusion .-

moral law depends on what we have beentaught, as well as what we learn. For this reason Nora felt guilty about doing something against the law, but did so with good intentions and good results because she loved to Torvald. It is also important as the moral norms are, in most cases, on legal norms.

References .-

l

Ibsen, Henrik. Dollhouse . Cleanup Ed. Argent